Should we allow use of custom Books
AFC - 2017 Regular Season
|
|
AFC East |
|
|
| Team | Owner | Ovr | Div |
|
Lethal | 4-2 | 0-0 |
|
maori Rugger |
3-4 | 0-0 |
|
SyrcsePride |
5-2 | 0-0 |
|
PacknLipper | 1-7 |
0-0 |
|
|
AFC North |
|
|
| Team | Owner |
Ovr |
Div |
|
TStrohbros | 5-3 | 0-0 |
|
CCBeaver | 1-6 | 0-0 |
|
Ovfd55 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
|
Luigi | 5-2 |
0-0 |
|
|
AFC South |
|
|
| Team | Owner | Ovr | Div |
|
Vanflank | 5-2 | 0-0 |
|
Dardman50 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
|
Zoufan | 6-1 | 0-0 |
|
Nwstudly | 3-3 | 0-0 |
|
|
AFC West |
|
|
| Team | Owner | Ovr | Div |
|
Bizzy | 5-2 | 0-0 |
|
Widow | 2-5 | 0-0 |
|
Doublenutt | 1-6 | 0-0 |
|
OJ jr | 3-4 | 0-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
+2
LethalNtention
ovfd55
6 posters
First Rule Vote Custom Playbooks
Poll
Custom Playbooks
- [ 10 ]
[42%]
- [ 14 ]
- [58%]
Total Votes: 24
ovfd55- Commissioner
- Posts : 1053
Join date : 2010-04-06
ovfd55- Commissioner
- Posts : 1053
Join date : 2010-04-06
I voted to allow think it could help spread out playbooks more and give less excuse to the book only has that type of plays
LethalNtention- May I park your balls?
- Posts : 414
Join date : 2011-07-25
Age : 48
Location : Dancing In The Endzone!
I voted to allow.
I think last nights playoffs were a great example of the quality of sim play. Â When playoff games are also ending with good feelings on each side then it shows the strength of our sim players.
Allowing them will provide even more positive experiences from all the different looks.
I think last nights playoffs were a great example of the quality of sim play. Â When playoff games are also ending with good feelings on each side then it shows the strength of our sim players.
Allowing them will provide even more positive experiences from all the different looks.
kotb- Posts : 290
Join date : 2011-09-09
Age : 36
I would change my vote to yes with the suggestion of restricting any play call more than 2x in a game if using a custom playbook.
LethalNtention- May I park your balls?
- Posts : 414
Join date : 2011-07-25
Age : 48
Location : Dancing In The Endzone!
Can we get that as a rule either way.kotb wrote:I would change my vote to yes with the suggestion of restricting any play call more than 2x in a game if using a custom playbook.
The 2x rule would be awesome with or without new custom playbook.s
kotb- Posts : 290
Join date : 2011-09-09
Age : 36
LethalNtention wrote:Can we get that as a rule either way.kotb wrote:I would change my vote to yes with the suggestion of restricting any play call more than 2x in a game if using a custom playbook.
The 2x rule would be awesome with or without new custom playbook.s
I concur
no1xdraftpck- ~OG~ will cut you
- Posts : 205
Join date : 2011-11-16
Location : MD
Good luck 
G Waffle19- Posts : 469
Join date : 2012-03-21
Location : Pittsburgh
i'm okay with the 2x rule with a custom playbook, not with standard playbooks. Â because a lot of pb's have a lot of the same plays from difference formations. Â it isn't always the users fault.
alwaysrushing- Posts : 308
Join date : 2010-09-18
Age : 36
I think having them would be so much fun. I never settle on a book, and I go through like 4 a season. This would make life so much easier by consolidating the formations that we like.Â
We could always try it for a probation season, and revote/discuss in the next offseason.
We could always try it for a probation season, and revote/discuss in the next offseason.
