Soo we used to be very against this but now I feel I am in the minority when it comes to being anti quarterback running. I am learning to accept this, but I still felt like voicing my concern.
My example is a 3rd and 3-5 yards. Offense has 3 or 4 wideouts, QB drops back few step drop then takes off running up the middle. The only players that react before the quarterback is atleast 4 yards downfield is the players pass rushing(which in this case is often just the 4 down lineman) So 5 blockers in front of a QB against 4 guys attempting to stop him.. going to get that first down 8 or 9 times out of 10 so how is that a fair maneuver?
You might say well what about a user backer(which i dont do). Even if you are in user coverage chances are you are going to be downfield or toward the sideline COVERING somebody. Shouldn't have to sit in the middle of the field the whole game because the qb runs, same concept as you shouldnt have to user cover a halfback the whole game if that was a teams primary pass catcher.
My example is a 3rd and 3-5 yards. Offense has 3 or 4 wideouts, QB drops back few step drop then takes off running up the middle. The only players that react before the quarterback is atleast 4 yards downfield is the players pass rushing(which in this case is often just the 4 down lineman) So 5 blockers in front of a QB against 4 guys attempting to stop him.. going to get that first down 8 or 9 times out of 10 so how is that a fair maneuver?
You might say well what about a user backer(which i dont do). Even if you are in user coverage chances are you are going to be downfield or toward the sideline COVERING somebody. Shouldn't have to sit in the middle of the field the whole game because the qb runs, same concept as you shouldnt have to user cover a halfback the whole game if that was a teams primary pass catcher.